Screen Schooled is written by Joe Clement and Matt Miles.
The subtitle of the book is Two Veteran Teachers Expose How Technology
Overuse Is Making Our Kids Dumber. According to the authors, too much
screen time at home and in the classroom has resulted in students who lack
focus, critical-thinking skills, and meaningful social engagement.
Education is trying to keep up with the digital world as districts are
going toward a 1:1 ratio of students and devices. On a mission to educate and
empower parents, they give examples of how screen saturation at home and school
has created a wide range of cognitive and social deficits in our young people.
Saturday, June 23, 2018
Tuesday, June 19, 2018
Is technology making our kids smarter or dumber?
Clement and
Miles address many issues with technology. As teachers, they do describe how the iGen
kids are obsessed with their phones and are constantly on social media in the
classroom instead of focusing on work. They cite extensive research on
the negative effects of screen-time on young people’s brains. Then they explain
that the concept of Ed tech improving student learning is increasingly looking
like a lot of hype. And that it is undermining and not supporting the
aims of high quality education. They also recognize that the push to infuse
technology into schools is a huge opportunity for making money and companies
are cashing in.
These issues are valid but I do not see them
as exclusively issues in education. These issues are under a much bigger
umbrella, that is our society. And education is a sub-category of our society,
therefore, the issues are there. These issues are not exclusive to our
education system, they are everywhere.
When we address technology in the classroom, the purpose is for technology to be one of the tools used to get to high quality education. Just infusing technology is not going to work. It’s the difference between using a word processing program instead of writing and essay with paper and pencil and collaborating to solve an authentic problem instead of taking a test. Technology is a tool to get to deeper learning. Educators need to design the learning to infuse technology. The goal is not using technology, it is collaborating, creating, contributing, communicating and critical thinking.
When we address technology in the classroom, the purpose is for technology to be one of the tools used to get to high quality education. Just infusing technology is not going to work. It’s the difference between using a word processing program instead of writing and essay with paper and pencil and collaborating to solve an authentic problem instead of taking a test. Technology is a tool to get to deeper learning. Educators need to design the learning to infuse technology. The goal is not using technology, it is collaborating, creating, contributing, communicating and critical thinking.
All the issues
that Clement and Miles are ethical issues. That is separate than
technology overuse is making our kids dumber. No matter what, and from
the beginning of time, teaching our kids to be good citizens has been around.
That is why teaching good digital citizenship is so important. Overuse of
anything is detrimental so maybe we need to apply the saying, “moderation is
the key” to technology, as well. Why should it be different?
Reading Screen
Schooled did open my eyes to seeing how technology is negatively effecting the
secondary school environment. But I don’t agree that they are arguing the
right point. I am in an elementary school that has high technology use. We are
almost a 1:1 environment if you count our BYOT. The students are using
technology for everything but it is effective use. That is a result of teachers
designing the learning with the 5C’s, authentic activities, and driving
questions in mind. We also have a huge emphasis on Digital Citizenship
because of our high technology use. We cannot dismiss technology from
education. It is part of the world therefore, it needs to be part of education.
Tuesday, May 29, 2018
Who am I?
Welcome to Schooled! For the
purpose of this blog, I am an educator, a student, and
a parent. I carry many other titles but these 3 roles will
help me pick through the DDLS principles and figure out if technology overuse
is making our kids dumber. As an educator, I can pull experiences from my
practice as examples of screen use in school to evaluate and synthesize an
opinion. As a student, the 6 Principles of my graduate program can be
used as a framework to make a determination. They are Teachers as Designers,
The Ends Principle, The Knowledge Principle, The Learning Principle, The Means
Principle, and Students as Designers. And finally, my role as a parent, gives
me the most authentic reason to figure this all out. I have a lot at
stake, the well being of my 2 sons.
In
the next few weeks, I will read Screen Schooled by Joe Clement
and Matt Miles. They are two veteran teachers who expose how technology
overuse is making our kids dumber. I am interested to see what they
say. At this point, before reading the book, I am skeptical and take a
stance that technology in school is beneficial. I see it first hand
everyday at my school. This might sound like a cliche but the students at
my school are developing the 5 C's to be 21st Century Learners. They are
creating, critical thinking, collaborating, communicating, and building
community. Let's see if I change my mind after I read this book.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
PBL approach
As I mentioned in the previous blog, my district is implementing PBL in all K-12 classrooms. This involves a lot of training, support, ex...
-
Clement and Miles address many issues with technology. As teachers, they do describe how the iGen kids are obsessed with their phones an...
-
DDLS Principles is a term that is used for my graduate program at George Mason University. The programs is called Designing Digital Learn...
-
What would Clement and Miles say about the DDLS principles? Clement and Miles offer 3 guiding principles that develop a new way of th...